Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428392›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Component puzzle protein-protein interaction prediction.

SeyedMohsen Hosseini, G Brian Golding, Lucian Ilie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

SeyedMohsen HosseiniDepartment of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, N6A 5B7 Ontario, Canada.
G Brian GoldingDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4K1 Ontario, Canada.
Lucian IlieDepartment of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, N6A 5B7 Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1856-3509

Funding

NSERC Discovery RGPIN-2020-05733NSERC Discovery RGPIN 2021-03978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins primarily perform their functions through interactions with other proteins, making the accurate prediction of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) a fundamental problem. Experimental methods for determining PPIs are often slow and expensive, which has driven significant efforts to improve the performance of computational methods in this field. While many methods have been designed, recent thorough investigations proved that the existing methods learn exclusively from sequence similarities and node degrees. When such data leakage is avoided, performances were shown to become random. We introduce C3PI, a novel sequence-based deep learning framework designed for predicting PPIs. C3PI uses as input ProtT5 protein embeddings into a complex architecture that includes two novel components, a puzzler and an entangler, which significantly enhance the model's performance. Through extensive comparisons with state-of-the-art methods across many datasets, C3PI consistently outperforms competing approaches, especially in key metrics such as AUPRC and AUROC. Most importantly, C3PI is the first PPI prediction method to achieve a significant improvement over random on the leakage-free gold standard dataset. C3PI is available as a web server at c3pi.csd.uwo.ca and source code from github.com/lucian-ilie/C3PI.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningProtein Interaction MappingProteinsAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinHumansSoftwareProteinsmachine learningprotein embeddingprotein interactionProtT5

Identifiers

PMID41428392
PMCPMC12713645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.