Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428380›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2026

Reward-specific learning parameters change across normative adolescent development and are blunted in youth with high risk for depression.

Holly Sullivan-Toole, Jeremy M Haynes, Helen Schmidt, Bart Larsen, Nathaniel Haines, Thomas M Olino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holly Sullivan-ToolePsychology and Neuroscience Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jeremy M HaynesPsychology and Neuroscience Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Helen SchmidtPsychology and Neuroscience Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bart LarsenMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nathaniel HainesBayesian Beginnings LLC, Columbus, OH, USA.
Thomas M OlinoPsychology and Neuroscience Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5139-8571

Funding

Developmental changes in reward responsivity: Associations with depression risk markersR01MH107495 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLINO, THOMAS M · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
Enhancing evaluation of reward learning using computational modeling methodsR21MH130792 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLINO, THOMAS M · 2022 to 2023
$427k
Behavioral and neural mechanisms of reward responsivity across normative and at-risk adolescent developmentF32MH127948 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SULLIVAN-TOOLE, HOLLY · 2021 to 2023
$205k
NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS F32 MH127948NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH127948-01A1NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH127948-01A1 (Sullivan-Toole)NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107495NIMH NIH HHS R01MH107495NIMH NIH HHS R01MH107495 (Olino)NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH130792NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH130792 (Olino)U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReward learning is thought to undergo refinement in adolescence, but little is known about how computational components of reinforcement learning develop. Given that adolescence is a sensitive period for reward system plasticity with associated vulnerability for depression, it is important to understand developmental trajectories of different reinforcement learning parameters in normative development and in youth at risk for depression.

methodsYouth aged 9-17 years completed the Play-or-Pass Iowa Gambling Task (PoP-IGT) across five timepoints. We calculated task metrics using a traditional scoring approach - yielding summary scores for good deck play, bad deck play, and net play - and a computational modeling approach - yielding parameters for reward learning rate, punishment learning rate, go bias, and sensitivity to win/loss frequency ignoring outcome magnitude. We examined normative developmental trajectories for each traditional and computational performance metric using multilevel models. Further, we examined whether maternal history of depression was associated with individual differences in these trajectories.

resultsAs hypothesized, youth showed a significant age-related increase in net play (p = 0.003), a measure of overall good performance. Exploratory analyses found that youth showed significant developmental change in reward-specific learning parameters including age-related increases in win/loss frequency sensitivity (FDR  = 0.016) and age-related decreases in reward learning rate (FDR  < 0.001). In line with hypotheses, youth at high risk for depression showed lower reward learning rates in early adolescence (p = 0.041).

conclusionsThe observed developmental changes in traditional and computational metrics are largely consistent with the optimization of learning from rewards across adolescence. Further, the observed developmental changes in specifically reward-related computational parameters are consistent with heightened adolescent reward system plasticity. Additionally, there was support for our hypothesis that maternal history of depression may exert a unique effect on learning from rewards specifically, but further research across additional reward learning tasks is needed.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentDepressionLearningReinforcement, PsychologyRewardAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleRiskadolescenceIowa Gambling Tasklearning ratematernal depressionreinforcement learningreward learning

Identifiers

PMID41428380
PMCPMC13047750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.