ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Anal intraepithelial neoplasia in Ireland: practice patterns and the case for regionalisation.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is a precursor to anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Although rare in the general population, the incidence of anal cancer is increasing particularly in high risk groups. While emerging evidence based management strategies are evolving, there is increasing recognition of the need for specialized, regionalized services to improve patient outcomes. This nationwide survey was conducted to determine the current AIN care landscape and to gauge opinion on development of centralised regional pathways for its management.
methodsA structured survey was developed using SurveyMonkey® and distributed by email to 60 currently practicing consultant colorectal surgeons in the Republic of Ireland. Participation was voluntary. A total of 20 responses were received and included in the analysis.
resultsOf the 20 respondents, 95% (n = 19) reported managing patients with AIN; however, 65% (n = 13) saw fewer than 10 cases per annum. Anal mapping was widely practiced n = 19 by all respondents who manage AIN patients, with a median of 12 biopsies per procedure (range 3-24). Common biopsy sites included perianal skin 83% (n = 15), anal verge 61% (n = 11), dentate line 28% (n = 5), and the squamocolumnar junction 22% (n = 4). The use of acetic acid and anoscopy was less frequent (25% for each, n = 5). Histopathology reporting was reported to be inconsistent and varied depending on the reporting pathologist, with terminology ranging from AIN to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Treatment approaches varied: 84.2% offered surgical excision, 57.8% topical therapies, and 47.3% ablation. Imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were the most commonly used topical agents. All respondents indicated a willingness to refer patients to a specialised centre should a regional AIN service be established.
conclusionThere is significant variation in the investigation, terminology, and management of AIN among colorectal surgeons in Ireland. These findings highlight the need for standardised national guidelines and support the idea of consolidating care for patients with AIN in specialised regional centres to provide consistency in the investigation and management of this condition in Ireland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41428308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.