ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
A study on the early clinical outcomes and learning curve of ARTHROBOT-assisted total hip arthroplasty under the ERAS concept.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does a longer operative time increase perioperative trauma in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty? A post hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Trial
- Research Trends and Knowledge Evolution of Surgical Approaches in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As robotic-assisted systems gain prominence in total hip arthroplasty (THA), their integration within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways presents new opportunities for precision and early recovery. This retrospective study compared 104 patients undergoing THA performed either conventionally or assisted by the domestic ARTHROBOT robotic system under an ERAS protocol. While the robotic group experienced longer operative time and slightly longer incisions, it demonstrated significantly superior accuracy in component positioning. Acetabular component positioning was more accurate with ARTHROBOT assistance, achieving a 92.3% rate within the Lewinnek safe zone versus 75.0% conventionally, along with better control of leg length discrepancy and improved restoration of femoral and combined offsets. Although patients in the robotic group reported higher pain scores on postoperative day 3, this difference resolved by one month. Importantly, both groups achieved comparable outcomes in terms of early full weight-bearing time, hospital stay, functional recovery (Harris Hip Score, range of motion), complication rates, and high patient satisfaction (over 94%). The learning curve for the ARTHROBOT system was approximately 20 cases. These findings support the clinical integration of the domestic ARTHROBOT system in ERAS-based THA, enabling enhanced implant precision without compromising early safety or recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.