ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Distortion correction in TSE near titanium implants at 0.55 T using reversed frequency-encoding and model-based reconstruction.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a method for imaging near titanium implants at 0.55 T, which enables the use of a low readout bandwidth for higher SNR while reducing in-plane geometric distortions. MATERIALS AND
methodsA pair of turbo spin echo (TSE) data with opposite frequency-encoding directions is acquired. For each frequency direction, a gradient nonlinearity (GNL)-corrected image is reconstructed with a model-based iterative reconstruction incorporating GNL. A susceptibility-induced displacement map along the readout direction is estimated from two GNL-corrected images. A single final image is reconstructed with the model-based reconstruction incorporating both GNL and metal-induced displacement fields using both k-space acquisitions. The proposed method is compared against TSE with view angle tilting (VAT) and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC).
resultsThe proposed reconstruction method maintains spatial resolution compared to current correction techniques. Unlike image-domain correction, VAT, and SEMAC, it does not introduce spatial blurring at equivalent bandwidths. It is feasible to reduce distortion due to off-resonance at a low readout bandwidth, resulting in higher apparent SNR (1.4-1.6-fold) without blurring under current imaging settings. In phantoms, and in patients with total hip arthroplasty and spinal fusion, the proposed method provides clearer delineation of tissues compared to conventional methods. DISCUSSION: The proposed GNL and off-resonance distortion correction method for imaging near metal at 0.55 T enables the use of low readout bandwidth, providing SNR improvements without the blurring typically associated with low-bandwidth VAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.