Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428267›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2025

Electrophysiological Response of the Non-Anesthetized Primate Brain to Minimally Invasive Local Infrared Neural Stimulation in Chronic Experiments.

Alexey Harauzov, Boris Nyushkov, Liubov Ivanova, Igor Korel, Daria Podvigina, Yuri Shelepin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexey Harauzov *Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia. harauzov@infran.ru.
Boris Nyushkov *Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, 630073, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-1230
Liubov IvanovaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia.
Igor KorelNovosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, 630073, Russia.
Daria PodviginaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia.
Yuri ShelepinPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FSUN-2023-0007Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation № 075-15-2022-303 from 21.04.2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infrared neural stimulation (INS) represents an invasive technique for modulating brain activity in animals, particularly primates, which serve as effective models for human brain research. Noninvasive approaches, such as transcranial laser stimulation, are safer but have lower spatial and temporal resolution, primarily altering metabolic processes rather than directly stimulating specific neurons. Invasive techniques provide better resolution by targeting neurons with focused laser beams but require intricate surgeries that damage the meninges, limiting studies to short-term experiments conducted mostly on anesthetized animals. We present a minimally invasive approach for long-term, high-resolution laser INS that does not disrupt brain tissue integrity and minimizes the risk of inflammation. Laser radiation is delivered through contact between a flexible optical fiber and the outer surface of the dura mater, allowing for chronic experiments on non-anesthetized primates who maintain their cognitive functions and physical activities. This method has enabled us to conduct a multi-day INS experiment and collect statistically reliable data on neurophysiological responses in a cognitively intact primate subjected to targeted high-resolution INS. We analyzed electrocorticogram and evoked potentials in various cortical areas while applying infrared laser stimulation directed at a selected point on the primary visual cortex of a rhesus macaque. Results indicated that even low-intensity laser stimulation (below conscious perception thresholds) caused synchronous biopotential changes not only at the stimulation site but also in certain distant cortical regions, suggesting a more complex brain response mechanism to INS than merely the activation of stimulated neurons. We believe the presented method will significantly facilitate chronic INS studies, further contributing to fundamental and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

BrainInfrared RaysAnimalsElectrocorticographyEvoked PotentialsMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsElectrocorticogramEvoked potentialsInfrared neural stimulationNon-human primates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.