ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Sustainable Development Goals as a Framework for Teaching and Learning about Health Equity in European Health and Social Care Study Programmes: A Modified Delphi Approach.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A health equity movement is underway, in which broad sectors of society must work together to create solutions to the complex interwoven problems that undermine equal opportunities for good health and well-being. Yet, addressing health inequity is a complex and challenging problem. Health inequity manifests through complex disparities that overload healthcare services and penetrate (all) other sectors of society. The aim of this study is to reach consensus on health equity related topics to be included in European health and social care study programmes by using the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). To identify such topics, a Delphi method was designed and performed in an expert panel comprising nine academics, clinicians, and members of a non-governmental organization. Using the Sustainable Development Goals as a framework, three rounds of surveys were conducted. The response rate was 100% across all rounds. In the first round, participants selected relevant SDG targets and indicators; 183 indicators were shortlisted. In the second round, participants rated the relevance of each indicator, leading to the endorsement of 142 indicators. In the third round, 162 out of 247 total indicators were endorsed. None of the Sustainable Development Goals were considered irrelevant to health and social care study programmes. We argue that to address health inequities effectively, health and social care professionals should liaise with a wide range of stakeholders in non-health sectors to design appropriate strategies to improve health and well-being. This implies that health and social care curricula should integrate competencies and capabilities that allow future professionals to work outside their traditional spheres of practice, communicating health information to a broad range of audiences, advocating and translating data for intersectoral action, and negotiating strategies and approaches to attain health equity in collaboration with stakeholders from different social sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.