Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428251›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

Sustainable Development Goals as a Framework for Teaching and Learning about Health Equity in European Health and Social Care Study Programmes: A Modified Delphi Approach.

Isabel Antón-Solanas, Fernando Urcola-Pardo, Ana B Subirón-Valera, Davide Ziveri, Camilla Wikström-Grotell, Alessandra Aresu, Joost van Wijchen, Djenana Jalovcic, Cia Törnblom, Anu Nyberg and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Isabel Antón-SolanasDepartment of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8206-4803
Fernando Urcola-PardoDepartment of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7049-8295
Ana B Subirón-ValeraDepartment of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. subiron@unizar.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5676-4179
Davide ZiveriHandicap International - Humanity & Inclusion, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-6419
Camilla Wikström-GrotellDepartment of Master Education and Research, Arcada UAS, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-3612
Alessandra AresuHandicap International - Humanity & Inclusion, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0800-0059
Joost van WijchenSchool of Allied Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8857-2032
Djenana JalovcicDepartment of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4164-4497
Cia TörnblomDepartment of Master Education and Research, Arcada UAS, Helsinki, Finland.
Anu NybergDepartment of Master Education and Research, Arcada UAS, Helsinki, Finland.
Beatriz Rodríguez-RocaDepartment of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0113-3318
Maria Nordheim AlmeDepartment of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0469-771X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A health equity movement is underway, in which broad sectors of society must work together to create solutions to the complex interwoven problems that undermine equal opportunities for good health and well-being. Yet, addressing health inequity is a complex and challenging problem. Health inequity manifests through complex disparities that overload healthcare services and penetrate (all) other sectors of society. The aim of this study is to reach consensus on health equity related topics to be included in European health and social care study programmes by using the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). To identify such topics, a Delphi method was designed and performed in an expert panel comprising nine academics, clinicians, and members of a non-governmental organization. Using the Sustainable Development Goals as a framework, three rounds of surveys were conducted. The response rate was 100% across all rounds. In the first round, participants selected relevant SDG targets and indicators; 183 indicators were shortlisted. In the second round, participants rated the relevance of each indicator, leading to the endorsement of 142 indicators. In the third round, 162 out of 247 total indicators were endorsed. None of the Sustainable Development Goals were considered irrelevant to health and social care study programmes. We argue that to address health inequities effectively, health and social care professionals should liaise with a wide range of stakeholders in non-health sectors to design appropriate strategies to improve health and well-being. This implies that health and social care curricula should integrate competencies and capabilities that allow future professionals to work outside their traditional spheres of practice, communicating health information to a broad range of audiences, advocating and translating data for intersectoral action, and negotiating strategies and approaches to attain health equity in collaboration with stakeholders from different social sectors.

Indexed as

Health EquitySustainable DevelopmentDelphi TechniqueEuropeHumansConsensusDelphiEducationHealth equityHealth professionSustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID41428251
PMCPMC12722463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.