Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428250›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026

The effect of personalized perioperative blood pressure management on intraoperative cerebral oxygen saturation, burst suppression ratio and postoperative neurological outcomes in patients having major non-cardiac surgery: an observational substudy of the IMPROVE-pilot randomized controlled trial.

Wiam Khader, Marc Hein, Karim Kouz, Alina Bergholz, Bernd Saugel, Julia Wallqvist, Sebastian Goldmann, Katharina Gräfe, Jan Larmann, Linda Grüßer

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wiam KhaderDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany. wkhader@ukaachen.de.
Marc HeinDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Karim KouzDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alina BergholzDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Bernd SaugelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Julia WallqvistDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Sebastian GoldmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Katharina GräfeDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jan LarmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Linda GrüßerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is not clear whether adopting personalized intraoperative blood pressure management could lead to better intraoperative regional cerebral saturation (rSO2), lower burst suppression ratio (BSR) or better neurological outcomes. Therefore, we performed this prespecified exploratory substudy of the IMPROVE-pilot trial to investigate the effects of personalized compared to routine intraoperative blood pressure management on the intraoperative rSO2. We also explored the effect of personalized intraoperative blood pressure management on BSR and the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) and delayed neurocognitive recovery (dNCR). We included patients aged ≥ 45 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-IV who were scheduled for elective major surgery. Preoperative automated nighttime blood pressure measurements were performed. Patients were randomized to personalized blood pressure management maintaining intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) at least at the preoperative mean nighttime MAP or to routine blood pressure management with a lower MAP intervention threshold of 65 mmHg. Intraoperative measurements of MAP, rSO2 on both hemispheres, and BSR were performed. POD was assessed daily on the first 3 postoperative days using the 3D-confusion assessment method or the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit. We screened for dNCR using the telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment on postoperative days 3, 7, and 30. We enrolled 55 patients and randomized 50 patients. 49 patients were included in the final analysis. The median areas under the baseline rSO2 and BSR were similar between the two groups. One patient assigned to personalized blood pressure management and none of the patients assigned to routine blood pressure management had POD. There was no meaningful difference in the incidence of dNCR between the groups. In this substudy of the IMPROVE-pilot trial, we observed no evidence of difference in intraoperative area under baseline rSO2 between patients who received personalized compared to routine perioperative blood pressure management.

trial registrationThis substudy was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS00025762, on December 3, 2021).

Indexed as

Blood PressureBrainMonitoring, IntraoperativeOxygenOxygen SaturationAgedArterial PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCerebrovascular CirculationDeliriumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative CarePilot ProjectsOxygenBlood pressureDelayed neurocognitive recoveryDeliriumIntraoperative hypotensionNeuromonitoringNIRS

Identifiers

PMID41428250
PMCPMC13053527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.