ArticleBiometrics2025
Statistical inference on high-dimensional covariate-dependent Gaussian graphical regressions.
Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many genomic studies, gene co-expression graphs are influenced by subject-level covariates like single nucleotide polymorphisms. Traditional Gaussian graphical models ignore these covariates and estimate only population-level networks, potentially masking important heterogeneity. Covariate-dependent Gaussian graphical regressions address this limitation by regressing the precision matrix on covariates, thereby modeling how graph structures vary with high-dimensional subject-specific covariates. To fit the model, we adopt a multi-task learning approach that achieves lower error rates than node-wise regressions. Yet, the important problem of statistical inference in this setting remains largely unexplored. We propose a class of debiased estimators based on multi-task learners, which can be computed quickly and separately. In a key step, we introduce a novel projection technique for estimating the inverse covariance matrix, reducing optimization costs to scale with the sample size n. Our debiased estimators achieve fast convergence and asymptotic normality, enabling valid inference. Simulations demonstrate the utility of the method, and an application to a brain cancer gene-expression dataset reveals meaningful biological relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.