ArticleBiometrics2025
Prediction of transition probabilities in multi-state models with nested case-control data.
Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-state models are widely used to study complex interrelated life events. In resource-limited settings, nested case-control (NCC) sampling may be employed to extract subsamples from a cohort for an event of interest, followed by a conditional likelihood analysis. However, conditioning restricts the reuse of NCC data for studying additional events. An alternative approach constructs pseudolikelihoods using inverse probability weighting (IPW) for inference with NCC data. Existing IPW-based pseudolikelihood methods focus primarily on estimating relative risks for multiple outcomes or secondary endpoints. In this work, we extend these methods to predict transition probabilities under general multi-state models and evaluate their efficiency. As the standard IPW methods for the prediction of transition probabilities may suffer from inefficiency, we propose two novel approaches for more efficient prediction and derive explicit variance estimates for these methods. The first approach calibrates the design weights using cohort-level information, while the second jointly models transitions originating from the same state. A simulation study demonstrates that either approach substantially improves efficiency and that their combined application yields further gains. We illustrate these methods with real data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.