ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Improving treatment education in Black and South Asian women.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDisparities in health outcomes for cancer patients from ethnic minority backgrounds have been reported, as consequence of direct care received or poorer access to services. As part of cancer care, patients are educated on treatments to minimise harm and maximise treatment benefit. Our evaluation was designed to understand gaps in cultural awareness of practitioners educating patients as part of their clinical practice, focussing on Black and South Asian women.
methodsThis mixed methods study involved a questionnaire containing 30 questions with specific statements based on awareness, knowledge and connectivity to patients of different ethnicities, which was completed by practitioners working with patients with cancer. The questionnaire was followed by focus groups inviting patients treated with systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT), who were >18 years of age and able to communicate for themselves. Rapid evaluation techniques were used to transcribe and analyse focus group data.
resultsNinety practitioners across the UK completed the questionnaire. Most participants were pharmacists (70%, n = 63). Sixty-nine percent (n = 62) of respondents were from the South East or London. Eighty-one percent (n = 73) were female. A large proportion of practitioners believed there were not enough resources available to them to adequately minority patients of different ethnicities; they identified language as a main barrier. Patients believed the complexity of language used in their education was a key area for improvement, as well as the need for more specific information on adverse events.
conclusionImprovements should focus on better communication, adverse event management and education, representing key areas of concern identified by this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.