ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Computational screening of natural phenolic compounds as potential EGFR inhibitors against triple negative breast cancer.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextOverexpression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is commonly found in triple negative breast cancer. This subtype does not contain the oestrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and HER2 amplification. The wide scope of biological activities and varied structural classes of natural phenolic compounds paves significant opportunities for drug discovery. The modern drug discovery process combines natural phenolic compounds and computational or AI techniques to develop novel drugs. Considering this fact, EGFR inhibitors were designed based upon the multiscale computational studies of natural phenolic compounds to identify the potent anticancer molecules for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).
methodPreliminary screening of all natural phenolic compounds (containing 440 phenolic compounds) was done by molecular docking studies using the glide utility of Maestro tools. The top scoring molecules were further subjected to MD simulation studies by using Desmond software. The obtained trajectory files were processed through R Studio software for data analysis employing PCA analysis, cluster analysis, and DCCM calculation. Then, binding free energies of complexes were determined by MMGBSA calculation, and drug likeliness of molecules were checked by in silico ADME calculation. These obtained in silico generated data were analysed, and it was concluded that the identified molecules bearing phenolic compounds would be a promising scaffold for EGFR inhibitors and anticancer drugs for TNBC. However, experimental results are needed to prove the obtained results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41428228What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.