ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
PFAS and cardiovascular risk : The effects of exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances on cardiovascular health.
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Exposure and Ischemic Heart Disease: Emerging Evidence from the Literature.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Knowledge structure and thematic organization of PFAS-associated cardiac toxicity: A bibliometric analysis.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Toxicological Effects and Health Impacts of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Humans.Toxics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) encompass numerous synthetic (man-made) chemicals with widespread use in industry and consumer products. Universal and life-long human exposure is nearly unavoidable and thus health concerns have emerged over the years, including the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Existing evidence on the link between PFAS exposure and CVD is somewhat mixed. The aim of the present narrative review is to summarize the available evidence on the impact of varying levels of exposure to PFAS on traditional CVD risk factors as well as subclinical and overt CVD. While there is mounting evidence of the association between PFAS exposure and dyslipidemia, and PFAS exposure and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, the evidence on the link between PFAS exposure and other CVD risk factors is less clear. Likewise, evidence on PFAS and overt subclinical and clinical CVD is inconsistent, with studies showing mixed results or even a protective association between PFAS exposure and clinical CVD. Potential mechanisms of disease involve PFAS-induced inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, impacting CVD risk. Certain populations, including pregnant women, children and individuals with pre-existing conditions, are more vulnerable to PFAS-related health effects. Exposure disparities are evident, with marginalized communities facing higher exposure levels and fewer resources for mitigation. Addressing PFAS exposure requires more assessment of the impact of PFAS mixtures and potential cumulative or interactive effects and additional regulatory actions to reduce emerging PFAS and limit PFAS levels in drinking water. Interdisciplinary research efforts are crucial to fully understand the impact of PFAS and develop effective mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41428216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.