ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Performance of a targeted LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of peanut, egg, and milk in various allergen-fortified or incurred foods.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the availability of numerous analytical methods for the quantification of food allergens, the global food allergen research community has recognized that many challenges in the field remain unresolved. Recently, guidelines have been released by multiple entities to align best practices within the field, particularly for method validation. With these recommendations in mind, a previously published liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the detection and quantification of peanut, egg, and milk was evaluated in four food matrices with varied chemical complexity and sample processing: fortified oat flour, fortified frozen dessert, incurred sugar cookie, and incurred gluten-free (GF) cupcake. Test materials were prepared at concentrations of 10, 15, 25, and 100 mg food allergen/kg matrix; then, previously established criteria were used to determine if the food allergen was detectable and/or quantifiable within each sample. Percent recovery for each quantifiable food allergen was determined per matrix and generally met recommended method performance requirements. The suitability of the method was also compared to target limits of quantification (LOQ) determined for each matrix using the ad hoc Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Risk Assessment of Food Allergens reference doses combined with the Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed (RACC). The method was able to quantify at the target LOQs for (1) peanut in oat flour, frozen dessert, and GF cupcake, (2) egg in oat flour and frozen dessert, and (3) milk in frozen dessert, GF cupcake, and cookie, demonstrating method performance at current reference doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41428214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.