Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428214›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026

Performance of a targeted LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of peanut, egg, and milk in various allergen-fortified or incurred foods.

Karen E Butler, Weili Xiong, Katherine L Fiedler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karen E ButlerU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Human Foods Program, Office of Laboratory Operations and Applied Science, Office of Chemistry and Toxicology, Division of Analytical Chemistry, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, MD, USA.
Weili XiongU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Human Foods Program, Office of Laboratory Operations and Applied Science, Office of Chemistry and Toxicology, Division of Bioanalytical Chemistry, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, MD, USA.
Katherine L FiedlerU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Human Foods Program, Office of Laboratory Operations and Applied Science, Office of Chemistry and Toxicology, Division of Analytical Chemistry, 5001 Campus Drive, College Park, MD, USA. katherine.l.fiedler@fda.hhs.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of numerous analytical methods for the quantification of food allergens, the global food allergen research community has recognized that many challenges in the field remain unresolved. Recently, guidelines have been released by multiple entities to align best practices within the field, particularly for method validation. With these recommendations in mind, a previously published liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the detection and quantification of peanut, egg, and milk was evaluated in four food matrices with varied chemical complexity and sample processing: fortified oat flour, fortified frozen dessert, incurred sugar cookie, and incurred gluten-free (GF) cupcake. Test materials were prepared at concentrations of 10, 15, 25, and 100 mg food allergen/kg matrix; then, previously established criteria were used to determine if the food allergen was detectable and/or quantifiable within each sample. Percent recovery for each quantifiable food allergen was determined per matrix and generally met recommended method performance requirements. The suitability of the method was also compared to target limits of quantification (LOQ) determined for each matrix using the ad hoc Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Risk Assessment of Food Allergens reference doses combined with the Reference Amounts Customarily Consumed (RACC). The method was able to quantify at the target LOQs for (1) peanut in oat flour, frozen dessert, and GF cupcake, (2) egg in oat flour and frozen dessert, and (3) milk in frozen dessert, GF cupcake, and cookie, demonstrating method performance at current reference doses.

Indexed as

AllergensArachisEggsFood AnalysisFood, FortifiedMilkTandem Mass SpectrometryAnimalsChromatography, LiquidLimit of DetectionLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryAllergensFood allergenLC–MS/MSMulti-allergenQuantitative proteomics

Identifiers

PMID41428214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.