ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Using deep vision-language models improves multi-task performance in assistance applications for endoscopic ENT surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDeep learning models for endoscopic assistance applications predominantly focus on image-based tasks, such as tool detection, anatomical classification, and workflow segmentation. However, these approaches often neglect the integration of natural language, limiting their assistance capabilities. This work adopts a proven architecture for vision-language models (VLM) to perform multi-task learning for image classification, text prediction, and surgical report generation, specifically for endoscopic ENT surgeries.
methodsWe adopted a VLM architecture utilizing encoders biased for the endoscopy domain for image and text embedding and combine them via cross-attention. The model was trained on a newly created multi-task dataset derived from 30 annotated endoscopic procedures, comprising 130,000 multi-label images, anatomical descriptions, and synchronized surgical reports. Two variations of the model, a lightweight 61M parameter and a 176M parameter model, were evaluated both against an existing baseline from previous mono-task studies as well as the EndoVit and SurgicalGPT models as external references. Ablation studies investigate the influence of removing image or text embeddings, and cross-attention on the task performance. Performance was measured for landmark classification, structured text prediction, and report generation using precision, recall, F1-score, BLEU-2, ROUGE-L, and cosine similarity metrics.
resultsThe VLM base model improves the baseline f1 score for image classification by up to 12% and natural language text generation by up to 14% across image classification and report generation tasks. The text generation of structured language tasks, however, showed minimal gains, indicating limitations in structured sentence learning from combined image-text embeddings. EndoViT and SurgicalGPT slightly trail our domain-specific VLM. The image-only and text-only ablations confirm that the vision component benefits language tasks, whereas text has limited impact on landmark detection.
conclusionWe developed a vision-language model capable of integrating image and text data for endoscopic ENT assistance tasks, that is able to replace three isolated models, delivering multi-task assistance while outperforming prior and general‑purpose baselines. Remaining challenges include the handling of imbalanced class distributions and limited gains on templated structured text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.