ArticleAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026
Past, Present, and Future of Sodium Hypochlorite in Dermatology: A Scoping Review.
Article in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor over a century, dilute sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), historically recognized as the antiseptic component of bleach, has been well established in wound care, primarily owing to its broad antimicrobial activity and ability to penetrate soft tissue and necrotic debris. NaOCl has been increasingly utilized and studied in clinical dermatology owing to its broad ranging antimicrobial, skin healing, and more recently described anti-inflammatory properties.
objectivesThis scoping review (Open Science Network; osf.io/6hyru) synthesizes current evidence of NaOCl's applications in skin care, highlighting mechanistic insights, clinical trends, and knowledge gaps.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted from inception through November 2024. This review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
resultsFrom 6959 deduplicated records, 222 studies published between 1915 and 2024 were identified for final inclusion. Four key clinical themes for NaOCl use emerged upon analysis of these publications: antimicrobial properties (n = 57), wound care (n = 64), eczematous skin disease (n = 78), and noneczematous inflammatory skin conditions (n = 23). NaOCl exhibits broad-spectrum activity against various organisms, notably Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, contributing to its effectiveness in treating chronically infected burns, ulcers, and other wounds. Limited studies also suggest NaOCl's potential role in modulating critical processes that support wound repair. In addition, the anti-inflammatory effects of NaOCl have supported its utility in treating eczematous and noneczematous skin disorders.
conclusionsCurrent literature provides broad and extensive evidence supporting NaOCl's role in wound-healing, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activity. However, considerable heterogeneity exists in recommended concentrations, preparation methods, and usage instructions across studies. There is a need for more randomized controlled trials and standardized protocols to better define the efficacy, safety, and optimal use of NaOCl in dermatologic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.