Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428066›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Reconsidering flexion-extension imaging: the emerging role of supine MRI and upright radiographs in isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Tom Folkerts, Lukas Schönnagel, Bernhard Hoehl, Luis Bürck, Izabella Preininger, Maximilian Muellner, Kirsten Labbus, Thilo Khakzad, Matthias Pumberger, Friederike Schömig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tom FolkertsCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany. tom.folkerts@charite.de.
Lukas SchönnagelCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bernhard HoehlCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Luis BürckCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Izabella PreiningerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Maximilian MuellnerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kirsten LabbusCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Thilo KhakzadCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias PumbergerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Friederike SchömigCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSegmental instability guides surgical decision-making in isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis (ILS). Despite concerns regarding radiation exposure, reproducibility and applicability in patients with pain or limited mobility, flexion–extension (FE) radiographs remain the standard for instability assessment. Combining upright radiographs with supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), both routinely obtained in clinical practice, may offer a comparable, lower-radiation alternative. This study aimed to compare segmental motion at L5/S1 between FE and upright–supine (US) imaging and to evaluate their ability to detect radiographic instability.

methodsIn this retrospective cross-sectional study, consecutive patients surgically treated for isolated L5/S1 ILS were screened for eligibility. Segmental motion was assessed using FE radiographs and US imaging, including measurements of dynamic sagittal translation and the proportion of patients identified with radiographic signs of instability. Preoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

resultsOf 126 screened patients, 78 met inclusion criteria (59% female; median age 48.5 years; median BMI 26.4 kg/m²). Dynamic sagittal translation was significantly greater on US than on FE (p < 0.001). US imaging identified more cases of radiographic instability (p < 0.001). Only US-measured translation was associated with preoperative low back pain intensity (p = 0.025) and was inversely associated with intervertebral disc degeneration (p = 0.014).

conclusionsUS imaging detected a higher proportion of radiographically unstable ILS cases than FE radiographs. Furthermore, only US-derived translation was associated with pain intensity, suggesting greater clinical relevance. Combining upright radiographs with supine MRI may offer a practical, low-radiation alternative for preoperative instability assessment.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographySpondylolisthesisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSupine PositionIsthmic lumbar spondylolisthesisLumbar spinal fusionLumbar spineSegmental instability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.