Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428054›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

The evolution of lepidopteran brain morphology.

Andrea Adden, Susana Garcia Dominguez, Katharina Kliem, Kavitha Kannan, Jothi Kumar Yuvaraj, Tugce Raif, Alejandra Boronat-Garcia, Sara Arganda, Gerard Talavera, Almut Kelber and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea AddenLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. andrea.adden@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6455-6313
Susana Garcia DominguezLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6383-5046
Katharina KliemLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kavitha KannanLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jothi Kumar YuvarajPheromone Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-3751
Tugce RaifLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Alejandra Boronat-GarciaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, USA.
Sara ArgandaUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Móstoles, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9875-2379
Gerard TalaveraInstitut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB), CSIC-CMCNB, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-1345
Almut KelberLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-2808
Stanley HeinzeLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. stanley.heinze@biol.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-3348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals live in diverse environments and have evolved to cope with environmental challenges in different ways. How such adaptations shape overall brain morphology is still unclear. Here, we test how two behavioural adaptations - circadian activity pattern and migratory behaviour - are reflected in the brains of moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera). We predicted that circadian activity pattern affects primary sensory regions, whereas migration impacts integrative centres. Using anti-synapsin immunostaining, we generated detailed 3D reconstructions of each species' brain and performed a phylogenetically corrected volumetric analysis. All lepidopteran brains, including early-diverging lineages, share a characteristic layout that differs from the caddisfly (Trichoptera) outgroup. Some brain regions proved highly evolvable - most notably, the anterior optic tubercle varied qualitatively among species. Most regions, however, differed quantitatively, with tissue volumes strongly shaped by phylogeny as well as behavioural traits. While activity pattern predominantly affected primary visual areas, migratory behaviour correlated with significant volume changes in the fan-shaped body, the accessory medulla and parts of the mushroom body. We also identified several small neuropils as evolutionary "hotspots", showing rapid, lineage-specific expansion or reduction. Finally, positive and negative correlations among neuropil volumes reveal coordinated evolution in defined neuropil groups, suggesting functional linkages and constraints beyond anatomically related regions. These findings generate testable hypotheses about poorly studied brain areas and highlight diverse evolutionary dynamics across the lepidopteran phylogeny.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainButterfliesMothsAnimal MigrationAnimalsCircadian RhythmNeuropilPhylogenyButterfliesEvolutionImmunohistochemistryInsectsMothsNeuroanatomy

Identifiers

PMID41428054
PMCPMC13086899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.