ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Predicting molecular types of adult-type diffuse gliomas based on MRI reports with large language models.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in predicting molecular types of adult-type diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO classification using MRI radiology reports. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 2169 patients diagnosed with adult-type diffuse gliomas (294 oligodendrogliomas, 295 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, and 1580 IDH-wildtype glioblastomas) between July 2005 and March 2024 from four hospitals in Asia and Europe. Seven proprietary and open-source LLMs were assessed: GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4.1-mini, Llama 3.1 8B, Llama 3.1 70B, Qwen2.5 7B, Deepseek-r1 8B, and Mistal 7B. The performance of LLMs in classifying molecular types was compared based on the provision of relevant knowledge of glioma imaging findings (knowledge-based vs. naïve prompt). The impact of radiologists' subspecialization in neuro-oncology, report quality, and reporting language on LLMs' performance was also evaluated.
resultsLLMs achieved significantly higher (naïve vs. knowledge-based; GPT-4o-mini, 77.0% vs. 79.1%, p < 0.001; Qwen2.5 7B, 75.9% vs. 79.5%, p < 0.001; Deepseek-r1 8B, 66.0% vs. 73.2%, p < 0.001) or comparable accuracy (GPT-4.1-mini, 78.7% vs. 78.6%; Llama 3.1 70B, 78.0% vs. 78.1%; Mistral 7B, 58.4% vs. 57.4%) using knowledge-based prompt compared to naïve prompt, except for Llama 3.1 8B (65.4% vs. 44.6%, p < 0.001). Differences in accuracy were more pronounced in smaller-sized LLMs. Additionally, the accuracy was significantly higher with reports by neuro-oncology specialists and high-quality reports in all LLMs (p < 0.001).
conclusionsLLMs may provide preoperative information on the tumor types of adult-type diffuse gliomas from MRI reports by providing relevant knowledge in the prompt. Informative and descriptive reports could further enhance LLMs' performance. KEY POINTS: Question Our study aimed to evaluate large language models' (LLMs) ability to efficiently predict molecular types of adult-type diffuse gliomas according to the 2021 WHO classification. Findings Larger models generally showed better accuracy and were less sensitive to domain-specific knowledge. Their performance improved when using high-quality, longer reports or reports by neuro-oncology specialists. Clinical relevance These findings highlight the potential role of LLMs in predicting glioma molecular types, underscoring the importance of informative and descriptive reports in enhancing their performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41428044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.