Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428010›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2025

In vivo evaluation of the outflow pattern of pediatric nephroscope with various access sheaths.

Vasileios Tatanis, Angelis Peteinaris, Theodoros Spinos, Paraskevi Katsakiori, Solon Faitatziadis, Nikos Mourmouras, Theofanis Vrettos, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vasileios TatanisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras Rion, Patras, 26500, Greece. tatanisbas@gmail.com.
Angelis PeteinarisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras Rion, Patras, 26500, Greece.
Theodoros SpinosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras Rion, Patras, 26500, Greece.
Paraskevi KatsakioriDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras Rion, Patras, 26500, Greece.
Solon FaitatziadisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras Rion, Patras, 26500, Greece.
Nikos MourmourasDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras Rion, Patras, 26500, Greece.
Theofanis VrettosDepartment of Anesthesiology and ICU, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras Rion, Patras, 26500, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras Rion, Patras, 26500, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the outflow of the sheath of pediatric nephroscope with access sheath of various sizes in the boundaries of a standardized in vivo experimental set-up. Two female porcines of 10 kg each were used in this experiment. The experiment was performed with the use of a 7.5Fr Pediatric Nephroscope and two different access sheaths; 8.5/9.5Fr and 11/12Fr. The measurements of outflow were performed with the use of gravity irrigation and manual pump irrigation. Additionally, the presence of accessory instruments in the working channel was evaluated. Using the 8.5/9.5Fr access sheath, the outflow with gravity irrigation was estimated at 12.3±1.3 ml/min, while under manual pump irrigation conditions, the outflow was calculated at 13.9±1.6 ml/min. The presence of Laser Fiber in the working channel diminished the outflow to 10.05±1.85 ml/min and 12.4±1.9 ml/min with the use of gravity and manual pump irrigation, respectively. Moreover, the outflow was estimated at 5.05±1.5 ml/min and 5.8±1.4 ml/min with the utilization of gravity and manual pump irrigation, respectively, when the basket was inserted into the working channel. The outcomes were ameliorated with the use of 11/12Fr access sheath. Both access sheaths used in this experimental study presented adequate outflow, even when the working channel was used for the introduction of instruments. Although no monitoring of IRP and temperature was performed in our experiment the outflow values we recorded probably correspond to safe changes in IRP and temperature.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignKidneyAnimalsFemaleSwineTherapeutic IrrigationNephrolithiasisPediatricPediatric nephroscopePediatric PCNL

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.