ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Viewing the Pelvic Floor Through a Philosophical Lens: Constructing a Novel Theoretical System for Pelvic Floor Stress Dysfunction Disorders.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Holistic Pelvic Floor: Pelvic Floor Stress Dysfunction Diseases.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisCurrent research on pelvic floor disorders is constrained by fragmented disciplinary approaches, static anatomical views, and insufficient attention to biomechanical balance. This paper is aimed at constructing a novel theoretical framework for pelvic floor stress dysfunction disorders (PFSDs) by integrating philosophical and scientific methodologies.
methodsUsing First Principles thinking, we redefine PFSD as a disruption of dynamic biomechanical equilibrium centered on the concept of "force." Inductive and deductive reasoning are applied to critically evaluate existing theories (e.g., Three-Compartment, Hammock), while verification and falsification principles are employed to expose logical inconsistencies between etiology and treatment.
resultsThe analysis reveals fundamental limitations in current theories, which fail to account for the dynamic and integrated nature of pelvic floor function. We propose physiological biomechanical reconstruction-rather than symptom-based repair-as the core therapeutic objective. Boundary-breaking innovation promotes a holistic understanding of pelvic floor synergy across disciplines.
conclusionsThis philosophically grounded framework shifts the focus from static anatomy to dynamic biomechanical balance, offering a logical basis for evidence-based PFSD management. It supports a transition from empirical to mechanism-driven approaches in both research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.