ArticleMedical mycology2026
Analytical validation: Comparison of two laboratory-based methods for CSF quantitative cryptococcal cultures.
Article in Medical mycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative cryptococcal culture of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is commonly used in cryptococcal meningitis research. We assessed the 'marble method' to evenly spread CSF onto two Sabouraud dextrose agar plates compared with the 'droplet method' using drops of CSF evenly placed around two halves of one agar plate. We found high concordance between the two methods. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the droplet method differed from the marble method by an average of -0.044 log10 CFU/ml CSF, with 95% limits of agreement from -0.324 to 0.235, indicating a small bias in favor of the marble method (P < 0.001). The droplet method of quantitative cryptococcal culture had no clinical difference compared to the marble method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.