Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427643›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Transdiagnostic App-Based Cognitive Bias Modification Intervention for Paranoia (Successful Treatment of Paranoia; STOP): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Embedded in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Chloe Hampshire, Charlotte Dack, Laura Eid, Carolina Fialho, Alexandra Kenny, Hannah Scott, Rayan Taher, Theresa Taylor, Jenny Yiend, Pamela Jacobsen

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chloe HampshireDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-7272-3045
Charlotte DackDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5124-094X
Laura EidDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-3252-9330
Carolina FialhoDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3777-3018
Alexandra KennyMcPin Foundation, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0162-9009
Hannah ScottDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-4433
Rayan TaherDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8592-527X
Theresa TaylorDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-4256
Jenny YiendDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-6292
Pamela JacobsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8847-7775

Funding

Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/V027484/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParanoia (unfounded concerns that other people are deliberately trying to harm you) can be a distressing experience that impacts day-to-day functioning for many people. Digitally delivered interventions are a promising mode of treatment that can increase access to support and reach populations underserved by current provision. One such intervention is the Successful Treatment of Paranoia (STOP) intervention, which is a transdiagnostic self-administered smartphone app for paranoia that was evaluated in England for efficacy in a large, multisite randomized controlled trial. Although there is growing evidence regarding how STOP may work, little is known about the factors that influence its implementation during or after a trial. Understanding these factors is critical for supporting the future adoption of STOP and may inform the implementation of other digital mental health interventions.

objectiveThis paper aims to describe the protocol for a process evaluation that will explore intervention implementation to understand how much, by whom, and under what circumstances STOP was used in a trial context and what factors might influence future implementation in routine practice.

methodsWe will conduct a mixed methods process evaluation informed by guidance published by the Medical Research Council in the United Kingdom and embedded in the main STOP efficacy randomized controlled trial, with the aim of understanding who agreed to try STOP, how they used STOP, and users' and health care professionals' views on factors that will affect future implementation, including barriers and facilitators. Process evaluation participants will include three samples: (1) STOP trial participants (randomized participants and nonrandomized referrals who agreed to try STOP), (2) individuals experiencing paranoia who participated in the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey in England, and (3) health care professionals in England. We will use mixed methods data collected in the STOP trial (demographics, app use, recruitment data, and qualitative data exploring intervention acceptability from the perspectives of users and health care professionals) and demographic data from another paranoia population collected in the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey.

resultsThe STOP trial was completed in December 2024, having recruited 274 participants. The process evaluation received funding in winter 2023. As of December 2025, data analysis for process evaluation studies 2 and 3 is ongoing following preregistration in July 2025. Results are expected to be completed and submitted for publication by February 2027.

conclusionsFindings from this process evaluation will help develop an evidence-based understanding of implementing STOP, including identifying suitable implementation strategies for posttrial delivery both inside and outside mental health services. Our findings will inform future iterations and the upscaling of STOP and may inform implementation of other self-administered digital mental health interventions.

trial registrationInternational Standard Registered Clinical/Social Study Number ISRCTN17754650; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17754650. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/81167.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMobile ApplicationsParanoid DisordersAdultEnglandHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicdigital mental healthimplementationimplementation scienceparanoiaprocess evaluationrandomized controlled trialsmartphone intervention

Identifiers

PMID41427643
PMCPMC12770924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.