Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427442›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nephrology and renovascular disease2025

Detection of Financial Toxicity in Italian Uremic Patients: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study.

Alessio Di Maria, Matteo Capone, Raul Mancini, Alfredo De Giorgi, Elisa Gavazzoli, Laura Maria Scichilone, Marco Veronesi, Simone Nicoletti, Fabio Fabbian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessio Di Maria *Dialysis Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-1247
Matteo Capone *Dialysis Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Raul ManciniDialysis Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-2252-9169
Alfredo De GiorgiClinica Medica Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0903-7825
Elisa GavazzoliDialysis Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-2720-8500
Laura Maria ScichiloneDialysis Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Marco VeronesiDialysis Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Simone NicolettiDialysis Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Fabio FabbianDialysis Unit, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5189-3695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Financial toxicity (FT) describes the strain individuals and families feel when they struggle with money due to medical expenses and related costs associated with their healthcare. Management of chronic kidney disease is expensive. The aim of this study was to detect FT in Italian patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Patients and Methods: FT was investigated using the Patient-Reported Outcome for Fighting Financial Toxicity (PROFFIT) questionnaire in 238 individuals, of whom 147 (61.8%) received hemodialysis, 30 (12.6%) peritoneal dialysis, and 61 had renal transplantation (25.6%). The PROFFIT score was normalized to a 0-100% range, with 100% indicating the highest level of toxicity, and mean values were compared in the different groups of uremic patients stratified by age, sex and treatment. Results: Mean age of the population was 66.2±13.7 years (range 23-89). The probability of FT due to financial distress in the whole population that was 42.1±24.1%, whilst mean probability of FT due to medical expenses response was 44.9±27.6%, mean probability of FT due to transportation response was 37.1±29.4% and mean probability of FT due to support from the Health System was 25.5±23.3%. FT was higher in the hemodialysis group. Conclusion: Hemodialysis patients showed worse financial burden than peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplanted patients, while peritoneal dialysis subjects felt better cared for by health care professionals than kidney transplanted individuals, however the latter group could afford monthly expenses better than hemodialysis patients. Health care professionals should discuss financial problems or other social challenges that may impact on the health of uremic individuals.

Indexed as

financial burdenfinancial hardshipkidney diseaserenal replacement therapy PROFFIT questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID41427442
PMCPMC12717215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.