Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427441›Full record

ArticleJournal of open psychology data2025

Data from Message Source Effects on Rejection and Costly Punishment of Criticism Across Cultures.

J Lukas Thürmer, Sean M McCrea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of open psychology data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Lukas ThürmerUniversity of Salzburg and Seeburg Castle University, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-2847
Sean M McCreaUniversity of Wyoming, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4241-5530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted the first systematic intercultural comparison of the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect (ISE). In a 2 × 2 within-participants design, participants from three countries representative of individualism (Canada), collectivism (China) and honour/face (Japan) responded to four critical comments (a) about their own culture or another culture and (b) by a commenter from the same or another culture. Participants responded to each comment on established self-report scales and could punish the commenter, at a cost to themselves. Finally, participants reported potential moderators and demographic information. We report robustness checks and detailed data descriptors to facilitate secondary analyses and follow-up studies.

Indexed as

collectivismhonour/face cultureindividualismintercultural differencesintergroup sensitivity effect (group criticism)

Identifiers

PMID41427441
PMCPMC12716248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.