Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427438›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

Introducing the Modified Cobb Angle for Measuring Cervical Spine Curvature During Swallowing.

Catriona M Steele, Makaya O' Grady, Sima Farpour, Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon, Sophia Werden Abrams, Maureen Folsom, Emily K Plowman, Ashwini M Namasivayam-MacDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catriona M SteeleKITE Research Institute - University Health Network Toronto Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4294-6561
Makaya O' GradySchool of Rehabilitation Science McMaster University Hamilton Canada.
Sima FarpourSchool of Rehabilitation Science McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-1129
Melanie Peladeau-PigeonKITE Research Institute - University Health Network Toronto Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7395-3027
Sophia Werden AbramsSchool of Rehabilitation Science McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-0610
Maureen FolsomAerodigestive Research Core The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Emily K PlowmanAerodigestive Research Core The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-4297
Ashwini M Namasivayam-MacDonaldSchool of Rehabilitation Science McMaster University Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9473-8844

Funding

Establishing Reference Values and Clinical Decision Points for Quantitative Videofluoroscopic Measures of SwallowingR01AG077481 · NIA · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI Emily Kate Plowman, Catriona Margaret Steele · 2022 to 2026
$4.3M
Landis Outstanding Mentor Award SupplementR01NS100859 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PLOWMAN, EMILY KATE · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077481NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective s: The C2-C7 Cobb angle is used to measure cervical spine curvature, an anatomical parameter that may be associated with swallowing difficulties in some patients. Challenges in visualizing lower cervical vertebrae on videofluoroscopic swallow study images led to the proposal of the C2-C4 modified Cobb angle (MCA) for use in swallowing research. Despite its initial promise, less than optimal reliability and validity suggested a need for improvement and further research. In this study, we aimed to explore the measurement properties of the MCA and a C2-C4 revised-MCA across key timepoints in healthy swallowing of thin liquid boluses. Methods: This exploratory analysis examined inter- and intra-rater reliability, as well as criterion validity of the C2-C4 MCA and C2-C4 revised-MCA in comparison to other measures of cervical spine curvature and head extension (C0-C2, C2-C6, and C2-C7 Cobb angles). Videofluoroscopic images from 35 healthy participants were analyzed using frames from still positioning, bolus passing the mandible, maximum pharyngeal constriction, and swallow rest. Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Pearson correlations, and mixed model analysis. Results: The C2-C4 revised-MCA showed superior intra- and inter-rater reliability and moderate positive correlation with the C2-C6 Cobb angle, demonstrating criterion validity. No differences in C2-C4 revised-MCA were found across swallowing frames, or as a function of participant age, sex, or head extension. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the C2-C4 revised-MCA has stronger psychometric properties than the MCA, confirming its utility as a cervical spine curvature measurement during swallowing. Level of Evidence: 4.

Indexed as

cervical spinecervical vertebraedeglutitionhead and neck alignmentswallowing

Identifiers

PMID41427438
PMCPMC12713095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.