ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Introducing the Modified Cobb Angle for Measuring Cervical Spine Curvature During Swallowing.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introducing the Modified Cobb Angle for Measuring Cervical Spine Curvature During Swallowing.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective s: The C2-C7 Cobb angle is used to measure cervical spine curvature, an anatomical parameter that may be associated with swallowing difficulties in some patients. Challenges in visualizing lower cervical vertebrae on videofluoroscopic swallow study images led to the proposal of the C2-C4 modified Cobb angle (MCA) for use in swallowing research. Despite its initial promise, less than optimal reliability and validity suggested a need for improvement and further research. In this study, we aimed to explore the measurement properties of the MCA and a C2-C4 revised-MCA across key timepoints in healthy swallowing of thin liquid boluses. Methods: This exploratory analysis examined inter- and intra-rater reliability, as well as criterion validity of the C2-C4 MCA and C2-C4 revised-MCA in comparison to other measures of cervical spine curvature and head extension (C0-C2, C2-C6, and C2-C7 Cobb angles). Videofluoroscopic images from 35 healthy participants were analyzed using frames from still positioning, bolus passing the mandible, maximum pharyngeal constriction, and swallow rest. Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Pearson correlations, and mixed model analysis. Results: The C2-C4 revised-MCA showed superior intra- and inter-rater reliability and moderate positive correlation with the C2-C6 Cobb angle, demonstrating criterion validity. No differences in C2-C4 revised-MCA were found across swallowing frames, or as a function of participant age, sex, or head extension. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the C2-C4 revised-MCA has stronger psychometric properties than the MCA, confirming its utility as a cervical spine curvature measurement during swallowing. Level of Evidence: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.