Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427397›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Critical spatial separation at the scale of V1 receptive fields determines motion segmentation.

Bikalpa Ghimire, Rohit Bakayat, Abhi Padala, Steven Wiesner, Xin Huang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bikalpa GhimireDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Rohit BakayatDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Abhi PadalaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Steven WiesnerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Xin HuangDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.

Funding

Neural Codes Underlying Visual SegmentationR01EY022443 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HUANG, XIN · 2014 to 2024
$4.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating elements that belong to a single object while segregating overlapping objects is a fundamental challenge for the visual system, exemplified by the phenomenon of motion transparency. While the middle temporal (MT) cortex is central to motion processing, the role of V1 in motion transparency remains controversial. It is still unclear at what spatial scale segmentation for motion transparency occurs. To address these questions, we conducted human psychophysics experiments using locally paired-dot stimuli moving in two directions separated by 90°. Subjects performed a 3AFC task to report whether the visual stimulus had no motion, a single direction, or two distinct directions. We systematically manipulated the path length of the dots, and therefore, the spatial separation between the paired dots, and the retinal eccentricity of the visual stimulus. We found that as the spatial separation between the paired dots increased, subjects' perception shifted from a single direction to two distinct directions. Critically, we found that the spatial separation required for this perceptual transition increased with the eccentricity and closely matched the known receptive field sizes of V1 neurons at those eccentricities. Direction segmentation occurred only when the spatial separation between motion components exceeded the V1 receptive field size. Conversely, direction integration occurred when the spatial separation was smaller than the V1 receptive field size. Our results demonstrate that the receptive field size of V1 neurons sets the critical spatial scale for direction segmentation and suggest that V1 plays a key role in motion transparency and, more generally, in motion segmentation.

Indexed as

eccentricitymotion integration and segregationmotion perceptionneural mechanismprimary visual cortexpsychometric functiontransparent motion

Identifiers

PMID41427397
PMCPMC12712929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.