ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Critical spatial separation at the scale of V1 receptive fields determines motion segmentation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating elements that belong to a single object while segregating overlapping objects is a fundamental challenge for the visual system, exemplified by the phenomenon of motion transparency. While the middle temporal (MT) cortex is central to motion processing, the role of V1 in motion transparency remains controversial. It is still unclear at what spatial scale segmentation for motion transparency occurs. To address these questions, we conducted human psychophysics experiments using locally paired-dot stimuli moving in two directions separated by 90°. Subjects performed a 3AFC task to report whether the visual stimulus had no motion, a single direction, or two distinct directions. We systematically manipulated the path length of the dots, and therefore, the spatial separation between the paired dots, and the retinal eccentricity of the visual stimulus. We found that as the spatial separation between the paired dots increased, subjects' perception shifted from a single direction to two distinct directions. Critically, we found that the spatial separation required for this perceptual transition increased with the eccentricity and closely matched the known receptive field sizes of V1 neurons at those eccentricities. Direction segmentation occurred only when the spatial separation between motion components exceeded the V1 receptive field size. Conversely, direction integration occurred when the spatial separation was smaller than the V1 receptive field size. Our results demonstrate that the receptive field size of V1 neurons sets the critical spatial scale for direction segmentation and suggest that V1 plays a key role in motion transparency and, more generally, in motion segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.