Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427380›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Scalable and Adaptive Spatiotemporal Modeling for Task-Based fMRI Analysis.

Jungin Choi, Abhirup Datta, Martin A Lindquist

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jungin ChoiDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University.
Abhirup DattaDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University.
Martin A LindquistDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University.

Funding

Personalized spatiotemporal hemodynamic response models for functional magnetic resonance imagingR01MH129397 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Martin Lindquist, TOR D. WAGER · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Task-based fMRI is commonly analyzed using voxel-wise general linear models, a non-spatial scalable approach that can yield fragmented activation maps. Spatial alternatives such as kernel smoothing and Bayesian models address this but either blur activation boundaries or are computationally prohibitive at modern spatial resolutions. We introduce SPLASH (Spline-Based Processing for Localized Adaptive Spatial Hemodynamics), a spatially adaptive and scalable framework based on localized thin-plate spline regression within brain parcels. Its spatial flexibility allows SPLASH to adapt to heterogeneous cortical organization and to generalize across diverse spatial domains. Using its hierarchical structure, we introduce a two-stage selective inference procedure that ensures valid false discovery rate control at the parcel and voxel levels. In simulations, SPLASH consistently delivered the best overall performance: its MSE was typically only 20-40% of that of prior spatial models, and both FPR and FNR remained well controlled. SPLASH also remained stable across smoothing choices and required only 2% of the computation time of Bayesian spatial approaches. Applied to Human Connectome Project data, SPLASH produced sharper activation patterns consistent with the motor homunculus and demonstrated higher reproducibility. SPLASH provides a generalizable, spatially adaptive, and scalable framework that strengthens statistical inference and improves neuroscientific interpretability in large-scale fMRI studies.

Indexed as

Adaptive spatial modelingFunctional MRIHemodynamic response modelingHierarchical false discovery rateSpatiotemporal spline regression

Identifiers

PMID41427380
PMCPMC12713664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.