Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427285›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

The representation of object concepts across the brain.

Spencer R Loggia, Helen E Feibes, Stuart Duffield, Karthik Kasi, Bevil R Conway

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Spencer R LoggiaNational Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20814.ORCID 0000-0001-7708-6541
Helen E FeibesNational Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20814.ORCID 0009-0008-1932-8686
Stuart DuffieldNational Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20814.
Karthik KasiNational Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20814.
Bevil R ConwayNational Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20814.ORCID 0000-0001-7715-9253

Funding

Using Color as a Model System for studying Perception, Thoughts, and ActionZIAEY000558 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI CONWAY, BEVIL · 2017 to 2025
$24.9M
Neural mechanisms of colorR01EY023322 · NEI · WELLESLEY COLLEGE · PI JAZAYERI, MEHRDAD · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EY000558NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms supporting concrete object concepts remain elusive. Here, macaque monkeys spent years learning object-concept primitives defined by color and shape. During fMRI, the monkeys held in mind one concept feature cued by the other. Using a whole-brain searchlight, we observed cross-feature decoding not in retinotopic cortex, but bilaterally in anterior inferior temporal cortex (aIT), temporal pole (TP), and frontal cortex (FC). Only TP and aIT had response patterns to concept shapes matching color-space geometry, and only PF had responses that decode behavioral errors. Two additional imaging experiments showed that color-associated versus non-color-associated shapes, and color-shape combinations congruent versus incongruent with the concepts, were distinguished only by extrastriate visual cortex, suggesting extrastriate cortex underpins color perception and perceptual feature binding. Together, the results provide a blueprint for how the brain generates stable object concepts and provides hypotheses for how conceptual representations engage perceptual representations through selective feedback during vision.

Identifiers

PMID41427285
PMCPMC12713754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.