ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Minimum flow decomposition guided by saturating subflows.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The minimum flow decomposition problem abstracts a set of key tasks in bioinformatics, including metagenome and transcriptome assembly. These tasks, collectively known as multi-assembly, aim to reconstruct multiple genomic sequences from reads obtained from mixed samples. The reads are first organized into a directed graph (e.g., overlap graph, splice graph), where each edge has an integer weight representing the number of supporting reads. By viewing the graph as a flow network, the underlying sequences and their abundances can be extracted through decomposition into a minimum number of weighted paths. Although this problem is NP-hard, prior work has proposed an efficient heuristic that transforms the graph by identifying nontrivial equations in the flow values. However, for graphs with complex structures, many equations cannot be fully resolved by existing mechanisms, leading to suboptimal decompositions. In this study, we revisit the theoretical framework of the flow decomposition problem and extend the equation-resolving mechanisms to jointly model all equations in the graph, enabling safe merge operations that iteratively simplify the graph. Experimental results demonstrate that our new algorithm substantially improves decomposition quality over existing heuristics, achieving near-optimal solutions for complex graphs, while running several orders of magnitude faster than the ILP formulation. Source code of our algorithm is available at https://github.com/Shao-Group/catfish-LP.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.