ReviewACS omega2025
Applications and Advances of Machine Learning in the Development of Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zero-dimensional anodes across monovalent and multivalent batteries: a critical review of interfacial dynamics, bottlenecks, and solutions.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Mitigating Jahn-Teller active MnRSC advances · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of global solid waste generation and composition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sn-MOF/Zn-MOF composite electrode with interfacial synergy for high-performance battery-supercapacitor hybrid devices.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) have attracted considerable attention for their ability to effectively suppress lithium dendrite growth and enhance the safety and life cycle of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, the commercialization of SSEs has been hindered by low ionic conductivity, limited mechanical strength, and poor interfacial compatibility. Recently, machine learning (ML) has arisen as a helpful tool in SSE studies owing to its efficient data processing and pattern recognition capabilities. This paper reviews recent progress in the application of ML techniques to SSE development for LIBs. It first discusses SSE database creation strategies, then examines the strong influence of descriptor selection on the model's predictive performance of SSE properties, and then highlights the use of various ML algorithms, such as predictive models and generative models, in predicting key SSE properties, including ionic conductivity, elastic moduli, and thermodynamic stability. Additionally, we systemically analyze and compare the interpretability and evaluation metrics of the ML models. We hope this review can provide researchers with a comprehensive perspective, promote the deeper integration of ML in SSE development, and facilitate rapid next-generation SSE discovery and design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.