Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427207›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

Applications and Advances of Machine Learning in the Development of Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Tiantian Gao, Yongliang Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tiantian GaoSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, PR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5424-2238
Yongliang WuSchool of Computer and Information Technology (School of Big Data), Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) have attracted considerable attention for their ability to effectively suppress lithium dendrite growth and enhance the safety and life cycle of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, the commercialization of SSEs has been hindered by low ionic conductivity, limited mechanical strength, and poor interfacial compatibility. Recently, machine learning (ML) has arisen as a helpful tool in SSE studies owing to its efficient data processing and pattern recognition capabilities. This paper reviews recent progress in the application of ML techniques to SSE development for LIBs. It first discusses SSE database creation strategies, then examines the strong influence of descriptor selection on the model's predictive performance of SSE properties, and then highlights the use of various ML algorithms, such as predictive models and generative models, in predicting key SSE properties, including ionic conductivity, elastic moduli, and thermodynamic stability. Additionally, we systemically analyze and compare the interpretability and evaluation metrics of the ML models. We hope this review can provide researchers with a comprehensive perspective, promote the deeper integration of ML in SSE development, and facilitate rapid next-generation SSE discovery and design.

Identifiers

PMID41427207
PMCPMC12713451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.