ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Data-driven discovery of antiviral peptides against PRRSV using multiple machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cellular machinery is built upon proteins and their functional interrelationships. Their network evaluation is essential for a comprehensive insight into biological processes and may establish a foundation for predicting antivirulence. Antiviral peptides (AVPs) have robust, broad-spectrum anti-virulence capabilities. Nevertheless, the existing predicted AVPs database is insufficient and necessitates more precise, reliable annotations. This study aimed to screen differentially expressed proteins and peptides of healthy and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-infected tissues and to predict AVP's using Machine learning and Deep learning based computational methods. Methods: Lungs, small intestine and large intestine samples were collected to validate and quantify proteins and peptides through proteomics, and followed by predicting AVPs by employing machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). Models were developed exploiting significant features based on physicochemical characteristics, encompassing amino acid composition (AAC), secondary structure, and hydrophilicity. Proteomics analysis facilitated peptide qualification through GO, KEGG, COG, and PPI analysis. To predict AVPs, we employed a DL graph neural network (GNN) by making its inaugural implication in this domain and benchmarked its efficacy against conventional ML random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models. Results: Findings demonstrated that lysine, arginine, and leucine were ranked nearly 0.1, highlighting their significant importance in prediction. Additionally, the correlation heatmap showed that lysine and glutamate exhibited the strongest positive association (0.57). RF model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 ± 2, verified via 5-fold cross-validation. In contrast, GNN and SVM models yielded 0.94 ± 1 AUC, demonstrating comparable performance across models, and revealed that the RF model outperformed compared to the others. Discussion: Integrating proteomics with computational modeling revealed peptides with antiviral potential against PRRSV. The RF model demonstrated the best discriminative power, and amino acid composition played a key predictive role. Consequently, these comparative predictive results may serve as revolutionized and distinctive resources for the experimental validation and identification of PRRSV AVPs as prospective therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.