Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427142›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Comparative review of copper-associated chronic hepatitis in dogs and Wilson disease in humans.

Tarini Ullal, Eunju April Choi, Dorina Gui, Valentina Medici

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tarini UllalDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Eunju April ChoiDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Dorina GuiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Valentina MediciDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copper-associated chronic hepatitis (CAH) in dogs and Wilson disease (WD) in humans are progressive hepatic disorders caused by copper accumulation. Although both diseases share similar pathomechanisms of copper-induced liver injury, they diverge in some aspects of etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods, and therapeutic strategies. Wilson disease arises from inherited ATP7B mutations while CAH in dogs might be more influenced by excess dietary copper with ATP7B mutations playing a lesser role. Dogs exhibit hepatic disease whereas humans show hepatic and/or extrahepatic manifestations, including neuropsychiatric and ocular signs. Dogs with CAH accumulate copper centrilobularly unlike human patients who develop copper periportally initially. There are several non-invasive diagnostic tools used to monitor the effect of treatment in humans with WD that are not available for dogs with CAH. Copper chelation and dietary copper restriction are used to treat dogs with CAH and humans with WD, but liver transplantation is not an option for dogs with CAH. This comparative review highlights the similarities and differences between CAH and WD, offering insights that may improve our understanding and management of copper associated liver diseases in dogs and human patients.

Indexed as

ATP7Bceruloplasminchelatorchronic hepatitiscopperliverpenicillamineWilson disease

Identifiers

PMID41427142
PMCPMC12711481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.