ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Ecologies of care: qualitative insights from a psychosocial study on veterinarians' experiences in Northeastern Italy.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last decade, literature has raised concerns about the psychological well-being of veterinarians, highlighting exposure to economic, organizational, and clinical stressors. However, most research is quantitative and concentrated in Anglophone contexts (UK/US), leaving a significant gap in qualitative, EU-based data. While quantitative research highlights trends, qualitative methods offer in-depth insight crucial for developing tailored interventions. Addressing this gap, this study adopts a qualitative methodology informed by a psychosocial framework to explore the lived experiences of 20 companion animal veterinarians in Northeastern Italy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Five themes were generated, revealing that veterinary science and veterinarians are undergoing a profound transformation within their evolving sociocultural role and mandate. Findings highlight tensions related to fragmented communities, socioemotional delegitimization, and the hidden weight of changing client dynamics. This ripple effect, marked by complex tensions affecting personal (expectations) and professional (caring function) domains, challenges the coherence and sustainability of their occupational identity and psychosocial well-being, requiring an ongoing labor of readaptation. The study concludes that contemporary psychosocial distress in veterinary work should not be understood solely through individual-level factors. Rather, distress reflects profound changes in the sociocultural landscape, including shifts in how human-animal relationships are framed and changing client expectations. This highlights a pressing need for veterinary science to engage in deeper dialog with the human and social sciences. An ecological perspective is essential for designing targeted systemic interventions, informing policy, and creating effective, context-sensitive training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.