ArticleFrontiers in radiology2025
Texture analysis improves lung-tissue segmentation on high-resolution computed tomography in COVID-19.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accurate separation of lung parenchyma, ground-glass opacity (GGO), and intrapulmonary vessels on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is challenging. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study that analyzed 530 adults (20-40 years) with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19. For texture modeling, we sampled 597 regions of interest (ROIs) representing parenchyma, GGO, and intrapulmonary vessels. Region-of-interest-labeled HRCT patches representing parenchyma, GGO, and vessels were analyzed using first- and second-order texture features that were computed across different square window sizes (5 × 5-20 × 20 pixels). Feature selection with stepwise linear discriminant analysis yielded a three-class classifier. The primary endpoint was overall classification accuracy, with the secondary endpoints including the effect of window size and identification of the most informative features. Results: The 20 × 20-pixel window produced the highest performance, with an overall accuracy of 88.6%. Five co-occurrence-based features (average difference, inverse difference moment, co-occurrence matrix standard deviation, sum entropy, and information correlation measure 1) were the most discriminative; the majority of the errors occurred at tissue boundaries where patches spanned mixed voxels. Conclusion: Texture-based feature extraction achieved 88.6% ROI-level accuracy and can serve as a supplementary tool during radiological interpretation of chest CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.