ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
[Comprehensive care of patients with type 1 diabetes in primary health care: policies, practices, and the role of civil societyAtenção integral a pacientes com diabetes tipo 1 na atenção primária à saúde: políticas, práticas e o papel da sociedade civil].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Glycemic control, psychosocial factors, and quality of life among people with diabetes in primary health care settingsControl de la glucemia, factores psicosociales y calidad de vida en personas con diabetes en entornos de atención primaria de salud].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Using Mexico as a case study, identify barriers and opportunities and formulate recommendations to strengthen management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in primary health care (PHC), with potential for implementation in other countries of the Region of the Americas. Methods: A two-stage exploratory qualitative study was conducted. The first stage consisted of a scoping review (2010-2020) of the PubMed, LILACS, and SCIELO databases for reports of successful comprehensive care practices for T1DM, classified into four domains: physical health, emotional health, functional, and social. The second stage consisted of semi-structured interviews with the chief executives of 12 civil society organizations (CSOs) in Mexico, to analyze their strategies for intervention, education, and linkage with public policies. Results: The scoping review yielded 12 studies, highlighting continuous glucose monitoring, diabetes education, and psychosocial support as key elements. CSOs in Mexico have developed innovative interventions, despite facing barriers such as a lack of basic supplies, nonstandard protocols, and reliance on external funding. Their interventions have had a relevant impact on improving self-care, access to technologies, and emotional support. Conclusions: The care of patients with T1DM in PHC settings requires a distinct model that combines sustained access to supplies, continuing education, and emotional support. The findings of this study can be used to outline a model adaptable to other countries of the Region of the Americas, based on coordination between the public sector and civil society to improve equity, continuity, and quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.