ArticleMedical research archives2024
Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Presentation at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center and a Safety-Net Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Medical research archives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The clinical setting where patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), especially young adults, accessed the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic to obtain their diagnosis is understudied. We hypothesized that patients with early-onset CRC (EO-CRC) present at disproportionate rates to emergency departments compared to patients with average-age onset CRC (AO-CRC). Patient and Methods: Clinical chart review was conducted for patients discussed at tumor board from the University of Texas Southwestern and Parkland Health Hospitals from August 2020 to August 2022 to compare the site of presentation that led to diagnosis: emergency department or primary care setting. Results: Two-hundred and ninety-three patients with CRC were included (69% AO-CRC, 31% EO-CRC), presenting at similar rates to primary care providers and emergency department (55% vs 45%, respectively). Most patients who presented to the emergency department received their cancer care at the safety net hospital (70%, p <0.001). Race/ethnicity, and comorbidities like obesity and metabolic dysregulation were also associated with emergency department presentation. Patients from the safety net hospital and those with obesity-related comorbidities were more likely present to the emergency department (OR 5.98, 95% CI 2.88 - 12.41, p<0.001; OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.18 - 14.81, p=0.03). Patients with rectal cancer are less likely to present to the emergency department (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 - 0.85, p=0.02). No differences were observed between EO-CRC and AO-CRC with respect to the presentation site. Conclusion: Here we identified factors linked to CRC diagnostic access to the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic in a racially and ethnically diverse population. Future research in this area can inform specialized CRC screening and diagnostic pathways for vulnerable young adults, guiding resource allocation to improve access to care and prompt diagnosis. Additionally, these insights can guide diagnostic access plans during global health crises for at-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.