Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427083›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

How Do Older People Experience Person-Centred Integrated Care? An Integrative Review of the Evidence.

Sarah Murphy, Tanya McCance, P J White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Development, structure, and function of the GeriatrIMSS Institutional Model].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah MurphyPhD Researcher, Atlantic Technological University, IE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-0817
Tanya McCanceThe Mona Grey Professor of Nursing Research and Development, Ulster University, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9787-2627
P J WhiteSenior Lecturer, South East Technological University, IE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5716-8643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: 'Person-centred integrated care' (PCIC) emerged in literature, policy and practice to meet the increasing care needs of an older population living longer with increased levels of chronic illness, multimorbidity and at enhanced risk of care fragmentation. Most evaluations of PCIC have been service-centred, rather than person-centred, and there is a lack of research on the effects of integrated care on patients, especially older people. Methods: This integrative review explored evidence regarding older people's PCIC experiences, synthesising empirical literature from five databases: Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Embase and Web of Science. Results: Findings included: i) definitions and components of integrated care and conceptualisations of person-centredness in the context of integrated care; ii) older people's positive PCIC experiences featured: coordination; continuity and relational care; involvement in care, including effective communication and information about care; and holistic care; iii) integrated care optimises care when successfully delivered, however, older people's experiences were mixed; and iv) barriers included a lack of integrated care frameworks developed from patients' perspectives, poor communication and information and staff shortages and turnover leading to discontinuity, limited time for meaningful interactions and follow-up care. Conclusion: While PCIC optimises care experiences, its evaluation is challenged by multiple conceptualisations and lack of engagement with service users.

Indexed as

experiences of careintegrated careOlder peopleperson-centred care

Identifiers

PMID41427083
PMCPMC12716249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.