ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2025
Understanding political perceptions of tobacco policies and stakeholders in France: A qualitative study with parliamentarians.
Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCharacterized by persistently high smoking prevalence, France nonetheless faces difficulties in implementing coherent and sustained tobacco control measures. To understand what sustains this situation, we explored how French parliamentarians perceive tobacco, tobacco control policies (with a focus on taxation), and the stakeholders they believe should inform policy decisions.
methodsAs all parliamentarians vote on tobacco control policies, between March and June 2022 we undertook 25 individual interviews with French senators and deputies representing diverse political affiliations and regions. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, guided by Grounded Theory. The section on tax increases was analyzed deductively. We used NVivo 15 for data management.
resultsAmong the 25 parliamentarians (17 senators, 8 deputies), they acknowledged the health and economic harms of tobacco, although some minimized its risks. They were more likely to consider media/educational campaigns and taxation as effective, and tobacco sales ban or plain packaging as not. Most accepted anti-tax arguments promoted by the tobacco industry (illicit trade, ineffectiveness, regressivity), and were more likely to engage with tobacconists than health stakeholders during consultations.
conclusionsIn line with streams identified in the Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework (problem, policy, political), this study suggests that competing framings of tobacco, weak support for evidence-based measures and a political environment favorable to the tobacco industry, weakened prospects for sustained tobacco control. Our findings highlight the need for further research exploring narratives likely to influence policymakers' support for tobacco control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.