ArticleHealthcare technology letters
Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Fungal Keratitis Diagnosis Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Fungal Keratitis Diagnosis Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungal keratitis (FK) is a severe ocular infection that can lead to significant vision problems or blindness if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Early and accurate detection of FK is essential for effective management. Traditional diagnostic methods are often time-consuming and require specialized laboratory resources. Recently, advances in artificial intelligence and computer vision have enabled automated diagnosis of FK using slit-lamp images. In this article, a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art techniques adopted for classifying FK using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images is presented. Detailed experiments and performance evaluation of various machine learning models are systematically performed, with a focus on evaluating the effect of diverse techniques for image processing, data augmentation, hyperparameters and model finetuning to assess each model's strengths and limitations. Experiments revealed that applying green channel preprocessing with a 12-feature set achieved 99% accuracy using Random Forest, highlighting its effectiveness in FK detection, while complex techniques like histogram modelling reduced accuracy to 64%. Robust models like AdaBoost and RUSBoost maintained high F1-scores, demonstrating adaptability to imbalanced medical datasets, and to real-world clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.