Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427077›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Automated Fungal Keratitis Diagnosis Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images.

Sowmya Kamath S, Shikha Reji, Vaibhava Lakshmi, Supreetha R, Pratiksha Gawas, Veena Mayya, Manali Hazarika

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sowmya Kamath SHealthcare Analytics and Language Engineering (HALE) Lab Department of Information Technology National Institute of Technology, Surathkal Mangaluru Karnataka India.
Shikha RejiHealthcare Analytics and Language Engineering (HALE) Lab Department of Information Technology National Institute of Technology, Surathkal Mangaluru Karnataka India.
Vaibhava LakshmiHealthcare Analytics and Language Engineering (HALE) Lab Department of Information Technology National Institute of Technology, Surathkal Mangaluru Karnataka India.
Supreetha RHealthcare Analytics and Language Engineering (HALE) Lab Department of Information Technology National Institute of Technology, Surathkal Mangaluru Karnataka India.
Pratiksha GawasHealthcare Analytics and Language Engineering (HALE) Lab Department of Information Technology National Institute of Technology, Surathkal Mangaluru Karnataka India.
Veena MayyaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education Manipal Karnataka India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-5053
Manali HazarikaCornea, Cataract & Ocular Surface Services Royal Eye Infirmary - University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust Plymouth England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal keratitis (FK) is a severe ocular infection that can lead to significant vision problems or blindness if not diagnosed and treated promptly. Early and accurate detection of FK is essential for effective management. Traditional diagnostic methods are often time-consuming and require specialized laboratory resources. Recently, advances in artificial intelligence and computer vision have enabled automated diagnosis of FK using slit-lamp images. In this article, a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art techniques adopted for classifying FK using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images is presented. Detailed experiments and performance evaluation of various machine learning models are systematically performed, with a focus on evaluating the effect of diverse techniques for image processing, data augmentation, hyperparameters and model finetuning to assess each model's strengths and limitations. Experiments revealed that applying green channel preprocessing with a 12-feature set achieved 99% accuracy using Random Forest, highlighting its effectiveness in FK detection, while complex techniques like histogram modelling reduced accuracy to 64%. Robust models like AdaBoost and RUSBoost maintained high F1-scores, demonstrating adaptability to imbalanced medical datasets, and to real-world clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

biomedical imagingimage processingmedical image processing

Identifiers

PMID41427077
PMCPMC12717025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.