ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2025
The Data-Driven Definition of "Complication" in Medicine.
Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of "complication" is widely used in the medical domain to designate unfavorable events in the course of medical care. However, the medical community has not yet established a strict and generally accepted definition of "complication". This makes it much harder to systematically track and ensure the safety of medical care, whether in an individual clinic or across the entire healthcare system. Results: We conducted linguistic and statistical analysis of the term "complication" using a large corpus of medical texts from 90,688 completed neurosurgical cases in the digital archive of the N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, spanning 2000 to 2017. The corpus was tokenized and normalized to obtain a vocabulary of 40,121 lexemes. A total of 5853 lexemes were selected as the lexicon of adverse medical events (LAME), supposed to be found in the context of complications. Using n-gram vector representations trained on our corpus, we obtained vector representations of LAME words and selected 4416 words as the sub-LAME core based on their positive cosine similarity with the vector for "complication". From the nouns, adjectives, and verbs in the sub-LAME, we extracted features that generalize, characterize, and classify complications. "Pathology" was identified as the generic concept for complication. The distinguishing features of complications were determined to be their novelty and emergence during observation of a primary phenomenon.Thus, we propose the following definition of "complication" for medical care safety monitoring:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.