Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41427006›Full record

ReviewCritical care research and practice2025

Droxidopa in Critical Care: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Off-Label Practice.

Carlos Valladares, Franklyn Vega Batista, Marc Faltas, Mareya Menteyas, Katherine Chiapaikeo-Poco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos ValladaresDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Miami, Miami, 33136, Florida, USA, miami.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-3510
Franklyn Vega BatistaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rutgers Health-RWJ Barnabas Health, Community Medical Center, Toms River, 08755, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2730-4861
Marc FaltasDepartment of Medicine, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, 08043, New Jersey, USA, rowan.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2772-4008
Mareya MenteyasDepartment of Medicine, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, 08043, New Jersey, USA, rowan.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0742-3454
Katherine Chiapaikeo-PocoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rutgers Health-RWJ Barnabas Health, Community Medical Center, Toms River, 08755, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3583-3446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prolonged use of intravenous (IV) vasopressors in critically ill patients is associated with significant complications. Droxidopa, a norepinephrine precursor approved for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, has gained interest as an off-label agent for facilitating vasopressor weaning in ICU settings. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of droxidopa for vasopressor weaning in ICU patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science through April 2025. Eligible studies reporting primary clinical data on droxidopa use in ICU patients were included. Outcomes included time to IV vasopressor discontinuation, duration of droxidopa use, ICU length of stay (LOS), and ICU mortality, and results were narratively synthesized. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I and the JBI checklists. Results: Seven studies involving 161 ICU patients were included. Five studies reported time to vasopressor discontinuation, ranging from 29 to 120 h. The duration of droxidopa use ranged from 87 to 192 h. Two studies reported ICU LOS, ranging from 18 to 44 days. ICU mortality was inconsistently reported. These findings are primarily drawn from small, retrospective studies and should be interpreted cautiously. Discussion: Findings suggest that droxidopa may effectively facilitate vasopressor weaning in critically ill patients. However, variations in dosing, patient selection, and outcome reporting limit generalizability. Evidence is drawn primarily from small, retrospective studies, some available only as abstracts. Conclusion: Available evidence on droxidopa for vasopressor weaning in ICU patients remains limited and heterogeneous, with very low certainty. Further research is warranted. No funding was received for this review, and the review was not prospectively registered.

Identifiers

PMID41427006
PMCPMC12714080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.