ArticleCritical care research and practice2025
Analysis of Influencing Factors of Junior ICU Nurses' Recognition and Response Abilities to Clinical Deterioration: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Critical care research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Influencing Factors of Junior ICU Nurses' Recognition and Response Abilities to Clinical Deterioration: A Cross-Sectional Study.Critical care research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the current status and explore influencing factors of junior intensive care unit (ICU) nurses' recognition and response capabilities to clinical deterioration. Design: This cross-sectional study followed the STROBE statement. Methods: From November 2024 to January 2025, 260 junior ICU nurses from five tertiary hospitals in China were recruited. Data were collected using a validated 25-item questionnaire spanning six dimensions to assess their recognition and response abilities. SPSS was used for statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis H/Mann-Whitney Results: The total score for recognition and response abilities among 250 junior ICU nurses was 99 (95, 103), with an average item score of 3.96 ± 0.83. Dimension scores ranked from lowest to highest: emergency handling, evaluation, teamwork, disease information analysis, disease information acquisition, and clinical decision-making. Education level, work experience, and participation in disease observation training were identified as significant influencing factors. Conclusions: Junior ICU nurses in China demonstrate relatively strong overall observation skills but insufficient clinical decision-making abilities. Nursing managers and educators should integrate these factors into training to enhance young nurses' capabilities in recognizing and responding to clinical deterioration, which is crucial for improving critical care outcomes. Patient or Public Contribution: Patients and the public were not directly involved in the design, implementation, or reporting of this study. However, the results of the study emphasize the importance of improving primary ICU nurses' clinical decision-making skills and emergency response skills, which may have an impact on patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.