ArticleCureus2025
Endoscopic Controlled Radial Expansion Balloon Dilatation in Infantile Achalasia: A Case Series of Four Infants.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achalasia cardia is an uncommon esophageal motility disorder that is often misdiagnosed as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although rare in infancy, it presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges compared to adults. We describe four infants who presented with early-onset vomiting and feeding difficulties and were diagnosed with achalasia cardia based on characteristic findings on timed barium esophagogram (TBE). None of our patients had features of Allgrove (Triple-A) syndrome, which is characterized by achalasia, alacrimia, and adrenal insufficiency. Serial controlled radial expansion (CRE) balloon dilatation was performed under direct endoscopic vision to relieve lower esophageal sphincter (LES) obstruction. The procedure was uneventful, and three (75%) infants showed marked clinical improvement, remaining symptom-free at a median follow-up of 4.5 months. Congenital esophageal stenosis, an important differential diagnosis in this age group, was carefully excluded based on characteristic endoscopic and radiologic findings. Infantile achalasia is diagnostically challenging because of symptom overlap with GERD and difficulty in performing manometry, limited cooperation for functional studies, and the requirement for specialized pediatric endoscopic equipment due to the small caliber of the esophagus. Timed barium esophagogram remains the most useful diagnostic tool, while CRE balloon dilatation provides a safe and minimally invasive alternative to surgery. Endoscopic CRE balloon dilatation appears to be an effective treatment option for infantile achalasia, with sustained symptom remission and nutritional recovery highlighting its feasibility and clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.