ReviewCureus2025
Restorative and Periodontal Outcomes of Deep Margin Elevation in Posterior Teeth: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biological effects of dental resin composites on human gingival fibroblasts: a systematic review of in vitro evidence.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Deep Margin Elevation on the Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Molar Zirconia Crowns.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of Cervical Restorations on Periodontal Health: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep margin elevation (DME) is a minimally invasive restorative technique that relocates subgingival margins coronally to facilitate adhesive bonding and isolation. It is proposed as a conservative alternative to surgical crown lengthening for teeth with deep cervical margins. The present systematic review evaluated the restorative success and periodontal response of DME, with emphasis on long-term restoration survival, marginal adaptation, and periodontal health. Electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL were conducted from database inception to August 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, and retrospective studies reporting restorative or periodontal outcomes after DME were included. Eight clinical studies (n = 678) were included: two RCTs, three non-randomized clinical trials, two retrospective cohorts, and one controlled clinical trial. Follow-up ranged from three months to 12 years. Restoration survival was consistently high, with long-term success rates of 94%-100% and slightly higher survival for ceramic than for composite restorations. Pocket depth remained within healthy limits (1.9 to 2.8 mm) across all studies. Early increases in bleeding on probing (up to 53% at 12 months) and plaque index were observed, but stabilized or decreased over time with adequate hygiene. Clinical attachment loss remained stable or showed slight improvement in long-term follow-up. DME yields excellent long-term restorative outcomes and maintains periodontal health when performed with meticulous adhesive technique and appropriate maintenance. Findings of the present systematic review support its use as a conservative alternative to surgical crown lengthening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.