ReviewCureus2025
Coping Mechanisms and Resilience Strategies for Addressing Impostor Phenomenon in Healthcare Professionals.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impostor phenomenon (IP) is a pervasive psychological challenge that affects healthcare professionals at all stages of training and practice. It is characterized by persistent self-doubt, feelings of inadequacy, and a fear of being exposed as incompetent, despite evidence of success. The high-stakes, hierarchical, and perfectionist culture of healthcare often amplifies these experiences. IP contributes to emotional distress, diminished professional performance, and potential effects on patient care, with frequent overlap with burnout, anxiety, and depression. Addressing IP requires a multifaceted approach encompassing individual, peer, and organizational strategies. Individual interventions, such as cognitive restructuring, mindfulness practice, and self-efficacy training, help reframe maladaptive thought patterns and strengthen resilience. Peer-based strategies, including workshops, group discussions, and near-peer mentoring, reduce isolation and normalize shared experiences. At the organizational level, cultivating a culture of authenticity and psychological safety is essential. Structured mentorship, one-on-one coaching, role modeling, executive presence training, and the integration of wellness and resilience principles into the curriculum can foster sustained professional growth. Although individual interventions may yield quicker relief, peer and organizational strategies provide essential reinforcement and long-term resilience. The most effective frameworks combine all three levels into comprehensive, continuous programs. Recognizing the broad implications of IP for both clinicians' well-being and its impact on patient outcomes, healthcare systems should prioritize initiatives that promote coping and resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.