Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426860›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Expanding Community Skin Cancer Services in the UK: Outcomes of Specialist-Led Head and Neck Surgery.

India Jacklin-Chatha, Ammar Ahsan, Syed Farhan Ahsan, Mohammed Al Abadie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

India Jacklin-ChathaOtolaryngology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR.
Ammar AhsanOtolaryngology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR.
Syed Farhan AhsanOtolaryngology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR.
Mohammed Al AbadieDermatology, North Cumbria Integrated NHS Care Foundation, North Cumbria, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Skin cancer incidence is rising in the United Kingdom, increasing pressure on secondary care dermatology and surgical services. Community-based management delivered in local clinic settings outside hospital environments has been proposed to enhance access and efficiency for selected non-melanoma skin cancers. Evidence regarding the safety of community-based surgery for head and neck lesions, which carry a higher functional and cosmetic risk, is limited. This study evaluates outcomes from a specialist-led community head and neck skin cancer surgery service in the West Midlands, UK. Methods A single-centre retrospective observational study included all patients undergoing community-based head and neck surgery for suspected skin cancer. Excisions were performed by two head and neck surgeons between January and December 2023. Demographics, lesion histology, anatomical location, margin status, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Narrow margins were histologically defined as<0.5 cm for all skin cancers. Primary outcomes were completeness of excision, margin involvement, and procedural complications. Postoperative infection was assessed in a randomly selected subset of 30 patients using simple random sampling. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise findings. Results A total of 101 patients underwent skin cancer surgery (59.4% male, 40.6% female; median age 75 years, interquartile range 19). Lesions included basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (38.6%, n = 39), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (13.9%, n = 14), melanoma in situ (5.0%, n = 5), melanoma (4.0%, n = 4), pre-cancerous lesions including Bowen's disease and actinic keratoses (5.9%, n = 6), basosquamous carcinoma (2.0%, n = 2), and benign lesions (30.7%, n = 31). Among malignant and pre-cancerous lesions (n = 70), complete excision was achieved in 98.6% (n = 69). One patient with basosquamous carcinoma had an involved margin (1.4%). Ten percent (n = 7) had narrow margins (<0.5 cm). No procedural complications were reported. Among 30 patients randomly selected for postoperative infection assessment, 77% (n = 23) were confirmed negative, and data were unavailable for 23% (n = 7). Conclusions Community-based specialist head and neck skin cancer surgery is safe and effective. When performed by appropriately trained professionals under Local Skin Multidisciplinary Team oversight, it achieves high rates of complete excision with minimal complications. Implementing specialist-led community clinics can improve patient access, reduce pressures on secondary care, and provide a scalable model for delivering high-quality skin cancer care closer to patients.

Indexed as

basal cell carcinomacommunity dermatologycommunity skin cancerhead and neckmalignant melanomaskin cancersquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41426860
PMCPMC12712733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.