ReviewCureus2025
Preoperative Risk Stratification of Adnexal Masses: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic Models and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa (ADNEX) Performance.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adnexal masses represent a frequent diagnostic challenge in gynecology, ranging from benign cysts to invasive ovarian malignancies. Accurate preoperative evaluation is crucial for determining appropriate management, surgical planning, and timely referral to oncology centers. Several diagnostic models have been developed to aid this process, including the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules, Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS), and the Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa (ADNEX) model. Among these tools, the ADNEX model has gained prominence as a comprehensive framework that distinguishes between benign and malignant tumors and further categorizes malignancies into four types: borderline, early, advanced, and metastatic. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on diagnostic models for evaluating adnexal masses, highlighting the clinical utility, advantages, and limitations of the IOTA ADNEX model. Available literature consistently indicates that ADNEX demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and superior risk stratification compared with traditional indices such as RMI and ROMA. The model enhances clinical decision-making by integrating multiple ultrasound and clinical parameters, although challenges persist in operator dependence and in detecting borderline or early-stage malignancies. Continued refinement, context-specific calibration, and integration with biomarkers and advanced imaging techniques are essential for improving diagnostic precision and standardizing global use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.