Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426844›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Role of Regional Anesthesia in Preventing Cancer Recurrence.

Mark Salib, John Salib, David K Sum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark SalibMedicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
John SalibMedicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
David K SumAnesthesiology, Community First Medical Center, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection remains the main curative approach for many solid cancers; however, recurrence and metastasis continue to present major challenges. Anesthetic techniques during the perioperative period may influence tumor behavior through their effects on immune and stress pathways. Regional anesthesia (RA) has been proposed as a potential strategy to reduce postoperative recurrence by limiting neuroendocrine activation, decreasing opioid use, and possibly exerting direct antitumor effects. A literature review was conducted to examine studies evaluating the relationship between RA and oncologic outcomes. Screening and synthesis were performed independently by multiple reviewers. Included studies encompassed laboratory, retrospective, prospective, and randomized research exploring both biological mechanisms and clinical outcomes. Experimental findings suggest that RA may help preserve immune function, reduce inflammation, and inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis. Early clinical studies indicated possible benefits in recurrence-free survival, though more recent large-scale research has not confirmed a clear reduction in recurrence or mortality. Overall, evidence remains inconsistent and influenced by heterogeneity across study designs and cancer types. Despite uncertain oncologic effects, RA continues to offer well-established perioperative benefits, including improved pain control, reduced opioid use, and faster recovery. Further large, tumor-specific, and mechanism-focused trials are needed to clarify any potential long-term impact on cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

anesthesia and cancer survivalanesthetic techniquescancer recurrenceoncologic outcomesperioperative analgesiapostoperative immunityrecurrence preventionregional anesthesiasurgical stress responsetumor metastasis

Identifiers

PMID41426844
PMCPMC12716821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.