ReviewCureus2025
Lack of Scientific Evidence for the Use of Gestrinone in the Treatment of Lipedema: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gestrinone, lipedema, and the limits of theoretical extrapolation in clinical practice: a critical narrative review.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disorder marked by the abnormal accumulation of subcutaneous adipose tissue, predominantly in the lower body and almost exclusively affecting women. In recent years, the off-label use of gestrinone - a synthetic steroid with androgenic, antiprogestogenic, and weak estrogenic activity, originally approved only for endometriosis - has gained attention as a potential therapy for lipedema, particularly in the form of subcutaneous implants. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of gestrinone for this indication. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and LILACS; clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC)); as well as national and international clinical guidelines and expert consensus documents published up to July 30, 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, case series, and clinical guidelines. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, with a third resolving discrepancies. The search identified nine records across all databases, registries, and other sources. After removing one duplicate, eight unique records were screened. All four records from indexed databases underwent full-text assessment. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, no studies - randomized, observational, or otherwise - were identified that evaluated the use of gestrinone for lipedema. Likewise, no ongoing clinical trials were found. Clinical guidelines and position statements from professional societies and patient associations uniformly advise against the off-label prescription of gestrinone for lipedema, citing the absence of scientific evidence. There is no scientific basis for the use of gestrinone in the management of lipedema. Healthcare providers should rely on evidence-based treatments, including compression therapy, tailored physical exercise, nutritional counseling, and psychological support and restrict hormonal interventions to ethically approved research protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.